Workshop on ICT Strategies for Islands
and Small States
(Malta, 17-19 March)
Session 5 : Infrastructural Development
Mr Keith Yeomans (Consultant) focused on
the threats and opportunities of the knowledge society for small
island states. He noted that small island states are a special case
because of their narrow resource base, high dependence on external
trade, their remoteness from world markets, high per capita cost
of infrastructure, masked poverty and low population scattered in
small clusters with a low income. They often face the double bind
of foreign exchange loss while lacking the critical mass for attracting
commercial investment. A more disturbing factor is the fact that
ICT infrastructure development is not considered as a priority by
development agencies. Small island and states are conscious of the
need to safeguard their traditional lifestyles and customs and to
preserve the natural environment. The conventional telecommunications
service has tended to emphasize isolation through a tele-cost environment.
The new technology should help small island states to overcome their
remoteness but the costs appear prohibitive. A South Pacific Forum
Report (1994) found that its member countries would need an eight-fold
increase in the number of telecommunications services to close by
half the gap between them and OECD countries.
The solution is the adoption of an integrated cross
sectoral strategy based on building partnerships across society,
maximizing the resources available for investment; creating economies
of scale; promoting inter-sectoral collaboration; aggregating demand
for equipment and services and thereby increasing bargaining power;
harmonizing standards in systems; and identifying gaps in provision.
On the basis of a review of the ICT strategies of Malaysia, Malta,
Singapore and the UK, the following critical success factors have
been identified : a clear vision of needs and priorities, a commitment
from the top (the most senior politicians), a needs and resources
audit, the role of government, the complementarity of interests
between the public and private sectors and the development of effective
partnerships. In the emerging globalised environment, the governments
of small island states seem virtually powerless but this may not
necessarily be the case. Governments may still exercise power, in
the following areas : statutory control over access to public land
and building, licenses for transmission and reception services,
laws governing the management of business, taxation and profits,
and rapid access to key client groups in education, defence etc.
The infrastructure is integrally linked to content
and human resources development. Development is content-driven and
access to good content is important. Strategy formation depends
on the dynamics of partnership - partnerships tend to be ad hoc
rather than planned and for this reason, they generally underachieve
or do not survive. Each and every partner need to know more about
the other partners they are dealing with - it is critical that they
profile their partners. Mr Yeomans proposed a strategic approach
to information society development for small island states, the
needs-based approach. Small island states have to ask themselves
the following questions to identify their specific needs - Are they
able to act on a national basis ? Have they got the critical mass
to do it ? or do they need to develop strategies on a sub-regional
basis ? Polities have to be pragmatic. In some cases, the lead organization
does not necessarily have to be government. Some of the factors
affecting the needs-based approach include functionality (what the
people are going to use the technology for), changing utility patterns,
vital issues including contextual factors, economic and social factors,
the environment; income distribution; technology change and redundancy
and innovative approaches to business.
Dr Michael Frendo (former Minister for Telecommunications,
Malta) started by posing the question whether governments are
in fact completely powerless in the globalised economy. Small islands
have small populations and are isolated and they must therefore
consider telecommunications as a strategic resource. Telecommunications
is the infrastructure of infrastructures. Telecommunications constitute
an opportunity which small states cannot overlook, as they allow
them the possibility of doing business over the Internet. Telecommunications
present a tremendous advantage for small islands and this has important
implications for policy. Malta has developed its telecommunications
along the clear lines established by the ITU. These are the main
lessons to be drawn from the Malta experience :
Small island states need to develop a good telecommunications
base, if they are to attract investors, as the latter want to
ensure that the new plant can be integrated into their global
network and link up with their other plants. Telecommunications
is a liberating infrastructure which opens up all sorts of business.
It is important to have the legal framework in
place, in order to regulate the structure. Latecomers, like Malta,
are in a weak position when negotiating with the big operators
as the latter have whole teams of negotiators. Small island states
need to have a strong legal framework in place, otherwise they
will be outdone in negotiating deals. It is also important to
decide on how to regulate the telecomms sector - do you have the
expertise ? Small islands may import a regulator, or they may
try to develop capacity within the country. The regulator needs
to look at both legal and business issues.
Another crucial issue is the issue of licensing
- a lot of operators will only bring their business to islands,
if they can be assured a monopoly. Small islands have to be aware
of the fact that while a licensing agreement may reap certain
benefits in the short-term, unless it has a limited time frame,
it will become a liability in the long-term. Licensing agreements
need to be flexible due to ongoing processes of fast global change.
Governments have to ensure that the terms of the licensing are
strategic and not short-term. In granting licenses, governments
must include as part of the package, some obligations on the part
of the licensee to develop the network throughout the community
to reach the remoter parts of the country, otherwise they are
not doing justice to the strategic needs of the community.
Small island states should be aware of the value
of frequency management as a resource which can be used to generate
a sustained revenue.
One of the strategic options open to islands is
to create hubs using fibre optic cable. Small islands can earn
a sizeable income from transit traffic, by connecting to the nearest
hub. By doing so, they are no longer isolated and they can become
significant players. Malta is fortunate in being able to establish
a marine fibre optic link to Palermo, a major hub connecting Europe
to the rest of the world. This link has not been fully exploited
as Maltacom is only now actively selling space on the link.
The issue of competition is important as states
should not be tied to one operator. This is extremely important
from the consumers perspective.
Internet usage and electronic commerce are important
sectors which should be developed.
Main points from the discussion:
1. In deciding whether to opt for satellite or fibre
optic links, it is important to bear in mind that the laying of
fibre optic cable takes longer but it provides a cheaper service
than satellite and is affordable for consumers. Cable provides a
more clean line than satellite and more capacity. However, if one
needs to make fast changes, satellite is better in this respect.
Rather than choosing one and excluding the other, the two systems
should be seen as complementary. It is possible to depend largely
on fibre optic cable and still have satellite as backup. With regard
to cable, although at the start there may be a lot of space, this
can be quickly used up.
2. The key success factors of Maltas telecomms
policy were :
the concept of hubbing - before Palermo, Malta
was the centre of telecommunications in the Mediterranean. When
the investment was being made, the focus was on the island rather
than its regional context.
the commitment at the political level is crucial.
the 400 year old university which provided an
important technical base and the expertise to understand the know-how
which was imported;
the investment depended on continued economic
growth - act of faith.
size is important as it is easier to reach people.
overall, there was a determination to get there
due to a realization that Malta could not do without telecommunications.
The latter was seen as a major development tool, which is in line
with the philosophy of ITU. The telecommunications policy was
actually planned with ITU assistance and it was achieved in a
four year span which has lead to Malta being used as a model.
Malta needs another plan now to take it to the next stage.
3. The setting up of call centres is a good option
for small islands as they are labour-intensive and offer opportunities
for training local staff at the expense of the foreign client. However,
in order to attract call centres to set up in the country, there
must be a pool of people with a good knowledge of languages.
4. It was agreed that there was a need to develop
a framework for formulating an overall ICT strategy for small islands
and states. This would address such key issues as the dynamic between
regulation, competition and monopoly. It was noted that in small
islands and states where it is difficult to achieve economies of
scale, it may make sense to opt for monopoly situations in the short-term,
with a view to introducing competition in the medium/long-term.
In terms of importing the regulator (to designating standards, telecomms
service etc), it is important to take note of the fact that in small
island economies, the regulator has to understand the role that
telecomms has to play in the development of the country and efforts
should be made to develop national competence in this regulatory
function. Similarly, in deciding whether to opt for domestic telecomms
ownership or overseas ownership which would provide more cost-effective
services, it is important to adopt a more long-term policy perspective
aimed at harnessing national capacity-building.
5. It was noted that in some small island states,
there are other limiting factors apart from small size, e.g. the
islands of the Pacific are spread out over a large ocean space and
the population is scattered. The premise of the technology is that
this should not be a problem. One would have to analyze different
technological solutions with a view to identifying the most efficient
and effective system. It was recognized that the issue of determining
the cost-effectiveness of the various options could prove problematic
and that the long-term benefits of such an investment for all the
other sectors, would have to be taken into account. One way of approaching
it would be to measure the internal traffic between the islands
and the level of the islands international traffic, however
these calculations would have to take into account the potential
for a substantial increase in traffic once the services are made
available. In Malta, for example, in the initial investments in
telecomms upgrading, data services took the backseat for a long
time. Thus, the introduction of packet-switching capacity was delayed
on the basis of current usage and demand which was limited at the
time - this contrasted with the increase in demand once the facility
was made available. It was noted that issue of costs is a major
obstacle in developing a strategy and this is where the vision is
important in breaking out of the current constraints and explore
the range of possible future scenarios. In this context, it is important
to convince decision-makers of the vital importance of investing
in ICT and developing a national ICT strategy. The politicians
five year time horizons constrain their consideration of long term
scenarios.
6. Another model of relevance to the Pacific Islands
is Finland, a country where the mobile phone system has been used
to connect the dispersed population. This type of breakthrough technology
may not be affordable for the Pacific Islands. Other technological
options mentioned were cable television, CETA (the airlines network,
which has spare capacity), copper wire (high redundancy), Iridium,
and Project OXYGEN.
7. There were differing opinions on whether Malta
constitutes a good model for other small island states as there
were major differences in Maltas specific circumstances as
compared to other small islands. In particular, Maltas 400
year old University gave it a clear advantage in terms of its human
resources. It is therefore important that small islands do not use
other small islands as models, simply because they are small islands.
However, the Malta model was important for other
small islands in terms of recognizing the specific environment of
small islands and the constraints which small islands face in the
globalised knowledge-based economy and how proactive strategies
can be developed by governments. The Malta model is not there to
be copied faithfully by other small island states but it should
serve to provide ideas for possible conceptual approaches to the
development of policy strategies. However, it is important that
small islands develop their own home-grown approach as part of a
community-wide collaborative effort based on interactive learning
processes. it is only by developing their own policy development
and policy learning capacities that small islands can generate the
national learning curve.
Session 5b : Guidelines for Developing a National ICT Strategy
1. VISION
What should the vision look like ?
The Vision should be based on :
defining a set of core values and ensuring they
are respected throughout the process and changing peoples
perceptions and attitudes accordingly
a holistic supra-sectoral approach -
all the stake-holders have to be involved (the
whole community, the public and private sectors, top politicians
and decision-makers, religious groups, and citizenry in the
Diaspora);
capturing existing development and sectoral
policies and revising them in line with the new vision. The
new Vision should not be subject to or constrained by existing
policies as the basic aim is to move to a completely new paradigm
for the electronic age.
a long enough time horizon to adapt to the fast
pace of change and changing needs (one of the characteristics
of the culture of the new electronic age is that we have to think
in longer-term time scales);
short, medium and long-term phases;
bringing in global organizations and experts on
the countrys terms and if really required (must ensure that
they are competent for the task at hand and that they do not monopolize
the process);
focus on opportunities and how they can be used
to overcome the constraints.
The Vision is a process not a project. It is a dynamic,
iterative, learning process.
STEPS TOWARDS A CIVIC ECOLOGY
|
<^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^>
VISION
<---------> M I S S I O N <---------> STRATEGY
<-------------------------
N E G O T I A T I O N------------------------->
|
2. STRATEGY
What should the strategy cover ?
Existing national development plans/policies should
be consulted as an initial point of reference but they should
not be allowed to influence the strategy, as this has to be developed
in line with the new ICT paradigm.
The strategy needs to be driven from the top.
There must be a champion to take the process forward, even in
the face of serious difficulties.
It needs to address the core values of all the
stakeholders in the nation
The strategy needs to be flexible to adapt to
change at the national and global level. It also needs to be dynamic
with in-built IT-based feedback processes which allow the strategy
to be refined and improved on an ongoing basis. This will make
the strategy process more transparent and accelerate the learning
curve.
The strategy should draw on the experiences of
other countries but adapt them to local needs.
The buy-in strategy involves showing different
stake-holders how their needs will be met.
How do you bring in the partners ?
3. IMPLEMENTATION : SETTING UP A NATIONAL ICT
FRAMEWORK
It is important to set up a national entity to
champion the process. It may be advisable where resources are
scarce to use an existing entity as it takes time for a new entity
to develop adequate resources for the task at hand. It is important
that the entity is adequately resourced.
This entity should reflect a public sector/private
sector/community partnership.
It should have political accountability, and a
legal and fiscal status, and it should maintain contact with the
full range of stakeholders. It should be politically robust and
well-embedded, strategically located close to the central policy-making
arm of government. It should be based on political consensus -
this is also very important in terms of ensuring continuity beyond
five year political plans.
The entity could have a 3-tier set up consisting
of :
a forum where all the stakeholders are
represented and consensus views developed;
a small working unit of technical people (not
just IT technicians) and trouble-shooters who can really monitor
what is happening to the strategy and ensure that it is dynamic,
by providing stimuli;
a linking mechanism with the government information
strategies (Government on-line) and the governance process.
The entity should incorporate an electronic feedback
mechanism for keeping the strategy updated and integrated and
improving its transparency.
The working unit should incorporate a policy learning
component responsible for monitoring developments at the national
and international levels; looking out for new models and drawing
lessons from success stories at the national and international
levels in order to update the strategy accordingly.
This national entity would be responsible for :
Formulating and and implementing the strategy
and keeping it updated
Developing a management programme
Advising on the strategys long-term sustainable
implementation and resourcing
Developing a national capacity-building approach
covering legal, institutional development, human resources development
and community awareness
Incorporating a legal framework which is flexible
and can easily adapt to change
Conducting negotiations with global partners (telecomms
operators and investment and venture capital)
Prof Bernard Woods
Sustainable financing solution - payment for use
of hardware and software
Comprehensive approach to the multi-functional
applications of the technology (rather than the linear, sectoral
approach)
A new form of utility - a new item on the development
agenda
Transformation in approaches for, and funding
of, the seven main fields of application of ICT
Usage - a new commodity
A mechanism for channeling funds directly to the
poor
A role for Commonwealth institutions in leading
new awareness, planning and action to introduce advances.
Small country advantages - flexibility, adoption
of new ideas, etc
|