COMNET-IT - The Commonwealth Network of Information Technology for Development
Disclaimer / Copyright NoticesContact UsSearchSite Map
COMNET-IT Home About Us News and Events Publications Members Only IT Gateway ICT Strategies E-Government

Online Magazines and Electronic Journals
COMNET-IT Newsletters
Reports
Recommended Books
Information Technology for Development
Adobe PDF Help

COMNET-IT Forum

Newsletter of the Commonwealth Network of Information Technology for Development


ISSUE 2

Previous Section Issue 2 - Table Of Contents Next Section

Year 2000


Introduction
Year 2000 Preparedness Initiative & Funding
Summary Information
Y2K Editorial View

Now - with less than 300 days to go until the turn of the century - we include a feature on the urgent Year 2000 issue and what actions you can still take locally. First read all about it...


Some Commonwealth Year 2000 web sites:

      or http://www.ogit.gov.au

    British = www.ukonline.gov.uk/online/ukonline/home

    Canadian = http://www.dec-ced.gc.ca/en/2000.htm

    Indian = http://www.y2k.gov.in/

      or http://www.year2000.co.nz/y2kgov07.htm

    South African = http://www.y2k.org.za


More recommended Year 2000 web sites:


A longer list of useful Year 2000 web sites is maintained under "Your IT Gateway" page at www.comnet-it.org. If you know of good links to add, please e-mail comnet@gov.mt.


Top of Page


Year 2000 Preparedness Initiative & Funding

The Commonwealth Year 2000 Preparedness Initiative had its provenance in the Commonwealth Finance Ministers Meeting (CFMM), held in Ottawa in September/October 1998, which established a Commonwealth Year 2000 Preparedness Facility. Britain's offer of GB£250,000 to the Facility set in motion the initial steps of the Year 2000 Preparedness Initiative. In its widest sense, the Commonwealth Year 2000 Preparedness Initiative has objectives which are aimed at realising the following three measurable outputs:

  • Delivery of a Comprehensive Year 2000 Strategy for each of the developing Commonwealth member states (Phase 1);

  • Testing and Implementation of Mitigation and Remediation for Year 2000 Compliance (Phase 2);

  • Delivery of Web Resource-Based Commonwealth Year 2000 Web site (to be implemented with Phases 1 and 2).

To date, the grant from the United Kingdom Government to the Commonwealth Secretariat (DFID Grant for millennium date change projects) under the Year 2000 Facility is being deployed for the implementation of Phase 1 of the Commonwealth Year 2000 Preparedness Initiative. The objective of this grant is to provide Expert Consultancy (local or external) to help Governments and Regional Organisations deliver a Comprehensive Year 2000 Strategy.

Two modes of approach have been designed by the Commonwealth Secretariat to implement Phase 1 of the Initiative, namely:

Top of Page

Approach Mode 1: (Regional Approach), in which regional organisations such as CARICOM in the Caribbean, SADC in Eastern and Southern Africa or FORUM Secretariat in South Pacific, and others eligible for the Grant, may apply for a Grant on behalf of their member states. Following months of logistical arrangements, assisted in part by timely and systematic interventions on behalf of the Commonwealth Secretariat by the Commonwealth Network of Information Technology for Development (COMNET-IT), which has been designated as Co-Execution Agency in the implementation of the Commonwealth Year 2000 Preparedness Initiative, CARICOM's Year 2000 Initiative is on course to commence in the first week of March 1999 with the aim to deliver Comprehensive Year 2000 Strategies for each of the 13 member states of CARICOM. SADC's Year 2000 Initiative under the auspices of the Commonwealth Year 2000 Preparedness Initiative is also scheduled to commence the in first week of March 1999, with the aim to deliver Comprehensive Year 2000 Strategies for 11 Countries. Year 2000 Initiative for member countries within the FORUM Secretariat umbrella are envisaged to follow a similar pattern, with an anticipated commencement date in early April 1999.

Under the Regional Approach, a Comprehensive Regional Year 2000 Framework is evolved, and a Country-Specific Year 2000 Strategy for each of the Commonwealth member states of a regional organisation is evolved, which is consistent with the regional framework. All Country-Specific Year 2000 Strategies are envisaged to incorporate, among others, the following:

  • Statement on National Top Level Commitment

  • Organisational Arrangement for Year 2000, with details of a National Year 2000 Task Force (or Equivalent) in each Individual Member State

  • Strategic National Plan for Year 2000 Compliance, including the following:

    • Problem Scoping

    • Problem Prioritisation

    • Identification of Strategy Options for Action

  • Contingency Planning Framework for Year 2000 Compliance Failures

  • Executive Strategy for Implementation, including:

  • Resource Allocation and Sourcing Framework for the following:

    • Skilled Human Resource

    • Financial Resource

  • Implementation Strategy for Delivery of Year 2000 Solutions, including:

    • Year 2000 Conversion Strategies

    • Year 2000 Testing Protocols

    • Choice of Year 2000 Compliance Criteria

Top of Page

Embedded in the Regional Approach is the inclusion of a training module, to be undertaken by the consultants, for all the counterpart National Year 2000 Team members from each of the member states early in the process of delivery of the regional framework.

The Regional Approach has been found to be cost-effective and efficient, as implementations are designed to be accomplished within a specific period for a whole region. This has been found to have the benefit of saving on expert consultancy travel costs, particularly where expertise is being sourced from outside the region under consideration. Unprecedented delays in the regional approach include the need by regional organisations to get the blessing of their Council of Ministers (or similar or equivalent) prior to commencement. This is sometimes necessary to demonstrate high level commitment by the regional organisation, which is considered essential for the ownership of a regional initiative.

Approach Mode 2: (Individual Country Approach), in which individual member states and/or national governments have applied as individual entities for assistance with the millennium bug. To date a total of 7 countries have done so or expressed an interest to do so in accordance with the Guidelines for Grant Applications: two in Asia, three in the South Pacific, two from West Africa. Of these, up to 5 national Year 2000 initiatives are anticipated to commence by early April 1999. Individual countries have been somewhat slow in responding to our December 1998 Announcement of the Grant, mainly as a result of the requirement for the countries to have in readiness a National Year 2000 Team to work in counterpart mode with the consultant(s).

The Individual Country Approach undertakes to deliver Country-Specific Comprehensive Year 2000 Strategies which, however, may not be subservient to the requirements of any regional framework.


What Next After the Delivery of the Comprehensive Year 2000 Strategies?

It is perceivable that member countries will be looking for assistance in relation to the Comprehensive Testing Phase following delivery of the Comprehensive Year 2000 Strategies. As part of the designated tasks of the consultants under the Commonwealth Year 2000 Preparedness Initiative, member countries will be assisted with the formulation of Project Proposals for accessing additional funds for further work. A number of member countries feel that remedial action of the kind associated with Phase 2 will be extremely crucial and critical for the achievement of reasonable Year 2000 preparedness.

Readers will be appraised of developments with regard to the other phases in the near future.

Top of Page


Perceived Risks in the Implementation of the Initiative

A number of logistical constraints pose serious risks with respect to the successful implementation the Commonwealth Year 2000 Initiative, including the following:

  • Short time span left before the dawn of the new millennium

  • Prevalence of inertia on the part of policy makers to adequately address the Year 2000 problem

  • Paucity of resources (including budgetary allocations) by member governments for the purpose of securing Year 2000 compliance

  • Legacy systems written in pre-fourth generation languages; these will be hardest to deal with, as these systems, after many years of travail, will have tended to lose their original documentation and hence existing codes will be difficult to decipher. Moreover, creating the test data for such systems is a daunting task.

  • Diverse embedded systems, known for withstanding long years of travail, are likely to pose the most difficult situations from the standpoint of identifying traceability chains to the manufacturers. Moreover, embedded systems engineering is scarce within the human resource skills matrix of Commonwealth developing countries.

Top of Page


PREPARATION OF PROPOSAL

  1. Candidates are requested to submit a Proposal based on the guidelines available from Mr Rogers W'O Okot-Uma at the contact address below (the main points of which are included here). There is no requirement for a standard format.

  2. The proposal should briefly provide an overview of the status of Year 2000 preparedness in the country. It should state in general terms what is envisaged as core and essential to the
    survival of government business continuity (mission-critical systems).

  3. In preparing the Proposal, the proponents should ensure that the Proposal includes:

    1. Request for an external Expert Consultant or an indication of the availability of a local Expert Consultant for the delivery of a Comprehensive Year 2000 Strategy in the manner stipulated.

    2. Availability of Staff Counterpart who would work hand-in-hand with the Expert Consultant assigned the task of delivery of a Comprehensive Year 2000 Strategy.

    3. Availability of a Year 2000 Scoping Project Team, who will provide the necessary staff effort to carry out the tasks stipulated.

  4. Candidates should include as attachments to the Proposal succinct information about the lead organisation/Ministry*, collaborating organisations, sectors or ministries together with profiles of members of the Year 2000 Project Team. The Candidate should make available a profile of the local Expert Consultant (if any); Commonwealth Secretariat will make available a profile of any external Expert Consultant appointed.

  5. Candidates will not be required to prepare a financial costing of the proposed Year 2000 Project, save that the proposal should state the estimated input in terms of units of one-, two-, or, exceptionally, three- person weeks.

  6. Candidates willing to contribute their own resources, or which propose to obtain and use resources from other donors for this work, are encouraged to submit a proposal in which Commonwealth Secretariat Year 2000 Grant is deployed in conjunction with the funds from the other sources.

Top of Page

*Any government Ministry, preferably the Government Ministry of Finance, it being understood that the proposal is for a national action as opposed to an isolated sectoral initiative. An intergovernmental regional body (or organisation) may be considered eligible for an award under the Commonwealth Year 2000 Facility provided the objectives satisfy the conditions of the Grant.


COMMONWEALTH YEAR 2000
PREPAREDNESS INITIATIVE CONTACTS :

Executing Agency:
Commonwealth Secretariat
(Attention: Rogers W’O Okot-Uma)
Marlborough House, Pall Mall, London
SW1Y 5HX England
Telephone: +44 171 747 6339
Fax: +44 171 747 6335
E-mail: r.okot-uma@commonwealth.com
or:100574.3255@compuserve.com


Co-Executing Agency

COMNET-IT

The above information was provided by Mr. Rogers W'O Okot-Uma, contact as above.


[ Preparedness Initiative ] [ Summary Information ] [ Y2K Editorial View ]


Previous Section Issue 2 - Table Of Contents Next Section

Last Revised: Wednesday, 25-Aug-2004 15:08:01 EDT
Contact: Web Administrator